The Alienation Of Gregor Sams The Bug Man - 1451 Words

Michael Gray 5/16/17 Intro to Literature: Fiction The Alienation of Gregor Samsa: the Bug Man Life can at times be an illusion that drops people into the deepest realms of the world. It can be an illusion so vivid and confusing that a person is seen by his or herself as nothing but an insect. This is the sad but real case for Gregor Samsa in the book, The Metamorphosis, written by Franz Kafka. Kafka delivers a story of a character, Gregor, who lives a tedious life. He is told as a man who cares for his family greatly, yet a man who lives in isolation. He works as a salesman for a boss he cannot stand, at a job he despises, yet he continues to work in order to support his mother, father, and sister. He has difficulties maintaining†¦show more content†¦The first step of Gregor’s alienation stemmed prior to his transformation into an insect. His work environment is an extremely dehumanization experience for him. His boss treats him awfully, and when Gregor missed the initial train he usually took to work, his mother and father were worried as to what do to. If he misses work they knew that he would be in extreme trouble with his boss. Kafka explains this situation as, â€Å"And even if he managed to catch the train, he couldn’t escape a dressing-down from the boss, for the attendant from work had been waiting at the five-o’clock train, and had long ago informed the boss that Gregor had missed it. He was the boss’s creature, stupid and spineless† (31, Kafka). Kafka describes Gregor as nothing but an insect floating around work, waiting to be stomped on by his boss. Gregor’s loathe for his work helps develop his isolation from the rest of the world, alienating him from his own body, into that of an insect. It becomes evident that Gregor hates his job, and especially his boss, when he first wakes up in the morning. Gregor thinks to himself, â€Å"If it wasn’t that I’ve held back on account of my parents, I’d have given in my notice long ago. Ià ¢â‚¬â„¢d have gone to the boss and told him what I thought outright, with feeling. It would make him fall off his desk† (30, Kafka). Gregor is sick and tired of working for his boss at the job

Applicability of Lean Management in Nursing Free Essays

Nurses also bring added advantages to the role of Lean leader-an uncompromising commitment to patient care and the natural ability to view hospital yester through the lens of the patient. The second literature â€Å"Lean Management in Med/Surge† By Barbara Mercer talks about the pros and cons of lean Management as Tracy Galilee, MBA, URN, has developed a professional and personal investment in the success of the organization- one aftercare’s lean facilitators. Lean management principles are derived from the manufacturing industry, specifically from Toyota Motor Corporation, which espouses continuous improvement and respect for people. We will write a custom essay sample on Applicability of Lean Management in Nursing or any similar topic only for you Order Now Sounds like a great idea to incorporate into healthcare, wouldn’t you think? The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (III) agreed. The ‘His 2005 White Paper Going Lean in Healthcare was based on expert presentations from the ‘HI Calls to Action Series. Among the experts was John Toasting, MD, president and CEO at Teacher, who was integral to bringing lean management to the organization. The white paper’s executive summary briefly explained the purpose and goals of lean management as they would relate to healthcare: â€Å"The Institute for Healthcare Improvement believes that lean principles can be – indeed, already are being – successfully applied to the delivery of health care. Lean thinking begins with driving out waste so that all work adds value and reverse the customer’s needs. For those unfamiliar with lean management practices, Galilee did not take over as a dietary counselor; instead, she assisted nursing staff to cut the fat from daily processes that stand in the way of the most efficient practices and the best possible outcomes for patients. Now the business unit manager of the med/surge unit, Galilee continues to assist staff in employing lean principles in a developing community of empowered problem-solvers. (2) The last literature to be reviewed is an article that spoke against the implementation of Lean Management Don’t ‘Lean’ on Me, Hospital Workers Say’ by Alexandra Bradbury [August 1 5, 2013. Part of the lean ethos is getting workers to participate in their own exploitation. Some hospitals offer nurses a boost of pay and status for championing a lean project. â€Å"Hospitals are very often successful at co-opting natural leaders,† Mencken said. What can the union do? First is to educate members to see through management’s hype-?what labor educator Charley Richardson called the â€Å"tricks and traps† designed to lull you into believing you and management have the same concerns at heart. These include Joint brainstorming, win-win rhetoric, and trust exercises. One strategy is to try to get your people onto the lean team-?but they probably won’t be picked, and it’s a â€Å"slippery slope,† Sheridan-Gonzalez said. Union members on Joint committees should treat every meeting as if it were a bargaining session, with two opposing sides. They can say, â€Å"We don’t accept your framing. We see this as a potential for harm,† Mencken recommends. And the usual union tactics can be used against lean, too: petitions, forms that document unsafe staffing, button/ sticker days, and marches on the boss to resist speed-up. 3) Study Population Nurses have served as leaders of 2 very successful Lean initiatives at the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (RUSH). Founded in 1884, RUSH is a Magnet hospital that is the principal teaching hospital of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey’s Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. Ea ch year Rush’s 1300 physicians and 1500 nurses care for more than 200 000 patients. The first case study-â€Å"OR Lean†-details the Lean transformation of Rush’s operating room (OR). The second case study describes the remodeling of Rush’s emergency department (DEED) with Lean principles and practices. Monsoons et al,2012) While nurses in Interiors Medical Center, New York and California Pacific Medical Center have iced out the disadvantages of Lean Management in their respective hospitals. Sources of Data A primary source data was utilized in this study. Lean management as cited in journals, articles and blobs and are mostly Internet based were used and acknowledged. Some of these Journals and articles are: â€Å"From Toyota to the Bedside: Nurses Can Lead the Lean Way in Health Care Reform† by Joyce E. Johnson, Amy L. Smith and Kari A. Master (Nursing Administration Quarterly,September 2012 ,Volume 36 Number 3 ,Pages 234 – 242), â€Å"Lean Management in Med/Surge† By Barbara Mercer, and â€Å"Lean Management Don’t ‘Lean’ on Me, Hospital Workers Say’ by Alexandra Bradbury ‘August 1 5, 2013 among others. Data Analysis As stated in the research’s sources 2 data clearly evolved and both stating favor and opposition towards lean management. The 2 cases in RUSH that favor lean management has the following results from their studies: case study 1 : OR LEAN The need for improved efficiency in OR scheduling has been although the number of Lean interventions in the OR reported in the literature is relatively small when compared with interventions in other hospital departments. Most recently in 2011, Violence reported a 20% increase in OR productivity and capacity n a Canadian hospital that adopted Lean methods. The electronic paperwork to discharge a patient is â€Å"eight pages of clicks,† said Betsy Prescott, a leader in the Massachusetts Nurses Association. Muff get spoken to if you miss one thing. ‘†some of these floors can have 15-19 discharges a day,† she said. Mire’s not taking care of the patient, you’re documenting. † (Bradbury,2013 ) Standardization is a watchword of lean management. Nurses at SST. Charles Medical Center in central Oregon were Justly proud of their Rapid Response Team-?it had saved lives. But that didn’t stop the administration from announcing plans to end the team. The rationale? Other hospitals don’t have one. Most hospitals now use computers to set staffing. You enter the number of patients on the unit today, and the software spits out how many nurses and nursing assistants are needed. Employers claim they factor in the severity of patients’ conditions-?but Mortally none of them do,† Burros said. (Bradbury,2013 ) Strengths and Weaknesses of the Study The strengths of this study can be summarized as the following: lean management was applied to a well known and prestigious hospital Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (RUSH). Founded in 1884, RUSH is a Magnet hospital that is the principal teaching hospital of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey’s Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and with well documented evidences that lean management worked for them. Other credible articles as to the applicability of lean management were also cited and gave a good argument to the promise that lean management can work for the healthcare sector. So in terms of credibility, accurate accumulation and evidence based arguments both for and against lean management were well presented. On the other hand, it is very clear that the main weakness of the study is its very limited scope and hence the uncertain conclusion as to whether lean management is applicable or not in nursing management. Conclusion It is very clear that the study has a very limited scope but we will summarize below both arguments for and against lean management in regards to its applicability in Nursing management. As shown in the results of the 2 case studies in order for lean management to succeed it must be: Leadership is critical for success The literature emphasized the central role of committed leadership in the success of Lean work. According to Doss and Orr, leadership is â€Å"an integral part of the Lean Operating System, not an afterthought. † The support of leaders, they suggest, can â€Å"make the difference between superficial attempts at implementing Lean-where the tools and techniques are evident, but the behaviors haven’t changed-and full transformational deployments where the entire organization embraces Lean from the bottom up and the top down. Monsoons et al,2012) Lean work is systems work In their 2010 review, Macho and Litter emphasized that Lean work is a whole yester strategy that cannot be done piecemeal and that no single â€Å"silver bullet† solution, such as a new computer system or automated equipment, can achieve the same results. Systems thinking, the discipline of seeing wholes and inter- relationships, is certainly not new. As Sense suggested more than 20 years ago, the systems perspective is badly needed in a world overwhelmed by rapid technological change, changing demographics, shifting borders, and increasing complexity. 5)(6) Monsoons et al,2012) Communication is critical to success From the outset of our Lean work, we knew that communication was the key to the horn-term and long-term success of our work. As we had done with past quality improvement efforts, we regularly reminded the staff to keep the vision of the future state in mind because, as the anticipatory principle suggests, the image of the future is what guides the current behavior within an organization. Monsoon et al,2012) As for the argument of those who are against lean management, the following reasons are cited: Lean management according to critics does not consider human factor for it stresses â€Å"no downtime, Just in time staffing, emphasis on the use of technology to monitor staffs performance, among others. Standardization is an emphasis of lean management that also rin gs alarm bells among employees who do not yet have a holistic appreciation for lean. In lean, first you standardize, then you improve. Improving a non-standard process is like remodeling a house built on quicksand. It won’t do you much good in the long run. â€Å"(Bait, 2010 ) If we continue to standardize work in hospitals without accounting for the variety nurses and hospitals get from patients we will make things worse for patients, nurses, doctors and the bottom-line. The system needs to be redesigned around the work by management, ruses, doctors and others working together to improve the system. This all begins by management changing their thinking around the design and management of work. Once management understands by seeing the damage of their thinking in a normative way can real changes impact the work. Bait,2010 ) Now, to answer our query whether lean management is applicable or not in Nursing management, we say it is still remain to be seen. Learning from both sides of the argument of for or against lean, it is safe to conclude that lean management is applicable but not to all types of health care institution and setting. As much as success of lean management s well documente d in the ROUGH, we have to remember this is a Magnet accredited hospital and employees are expected to get used to high standard work and compliance to a strong administrative leadership and management. Lean management is also about culture change and resistance will be expected so those who oppose have some valid points in which management has to seriously consider. After all for any system or management to work, people’s satisfaction and cooperation should be addressed foremost and not to be ignored or taken for granted. Otherwise, what is the use of introducing a promising system such as lean management when in he process it will lead to dissatisfied and tired staff? How to cite Applicability of Lean Management in Nursing, Papers

Why does Mrs Maloney get away and Roylott doesnt Essay Example

Why does Mrs Maloney get away and Roylott doesnt Essay Although both Lambs to the Slaughter and the Speckled Band are of the same genre (murder mystery) they have many differences making them different from each other. These differences suggest why Mrs Maloney gets away and Roylott doesnt get away with it. The protagonist in each story is viewed in a different way. We watch Maloney to see if she gets found out, Sherlock Holmes to catch his man because Sherlock Holmes always gets his man. From this simple quote his man you can see it brings up a number of issues concerning the historical differences in the story. His man already suggests the murderer is a man because of the sexist views on woman on this time. Roald Dahl capitalises on this idea and makes a change. This shows how the audience expectation over time changes and what changing prolonging ideas do to the surprising aspects of the story. There are countless differences in the stories although theyre of the same genre: murderers are of different sex, Roylott is selfish selfless; Mrs Maloney is selfless, protagonist murderer; protagonist detective. These are just a few of the differences. These sources show that the two stories could be of there own specialised genre because of the vast number of differences. They could be in their own category within the murder mystery genre. This suggests why Roylott is caught and Mrs Maloney isnt, because their two different genres, within the vast murder mystery genre. The murderers caught in one genre and in the other genre the murderer doesnt. In Roylotts book genre he gets caught because that is the way it is in that particular genre. We will write a custom essay sample on Why does Mrs Maloney get away and Roylott doesnt specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Why does Mrs Maloney get away and Roylott doesnt specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Why does Mrs Maloney get away and Roylott doesnt specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Although there are many differences there are also many similarities, which makes the two stories, fall under the same genre: both involve murders, both are stories, both employ unexpected murder weapons. The time difference in the two stories means that the people have a different expectation of what expect in a story. The time difference in the Speckled Band is clearly shown by the language, yet you had a good drive in a dogcart. We wouldnt use dogcart in todays language; if people wrote differently their expectation is bound to of changed. The audience at the time of the Speckled Band Would expect the murderer to be a man. Change in audience suggests why Roylott gets caught and Mrs Maloney doesnt. Out of the two murderers Roylott seems the more likely to get away with the murder because he is very scheming. He plans the whole murder, which seems flawless and hes a doctor so hes intelligent enough to get away with planning a successful murder. Mrs Maloney on the other hand because she doesnt work and stays at home waiting for her husband would be less intelligent, Mary Maloney was waiting for her husband to come home from work. This would be normal for a mid 20th housewife to stay at home and wait for husband. A woman wouldnt be expected to work let alone kill someone. A woman wouldnt be able to conceal such a crime without planning it according to audience preconceptions: At that point Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause she swung the big frozen leg on the back of his head. She also loved the man so much she would do anything for him, she loved to luxuriate in the presence of this man. Any reader, Dahls 20th century one audience or Doyle that emotional state to be caught where as Roylott who took a medical degree and went to Calcutta, where by his own professional skill, he established a large practice wouldnt. Just for being a woman and not a man a Doyles 19th century audience and Dahls 20th century audience would expect Mrs. Maloney to be caught. Also Roylott to a 19th century reader would be thought to be tougher than a woman who are portrayed weaker in the Speckled Band as well as in Lamb to the Slaughter. Ii was Mrs Stoner who went to see Holmes because she was scared, its not the cold that makes me shiver. Roald Dahls subverts what people expect and makes Mrs Maloney the murderer to surprise the audience. It is even more surprising for Doyles 19th century audience and Dahls 20th century audience that Mrs Maloney gets away with it. Mrs Maloney gets away with it because Dahl as an author wants to surprise the audience by making something unexpected happen. The story is a murder mystery and it is a shock to the audience that a woman could kill. Dahl shocks his Lamb to the Slaughter reader because it is not Mary Maloney (not because she is a woman) but her husband who seems the more likely killer. When her husband comes in, his mind seems to be occupied by something else. He seems to answer her questions rudely, darling shall I get your slippers (Mrs Maloney speaking) no he answers (Mr Maloney). He answers the next questions no, I dont want it, forget it. Clearly he doesnt really want to speak to her. Mr Maloney is also drinking heavily: When he (Mr Maloney) came back, she noticed that the new drink was dark amber with the quantity of whisky in it. Mr Maloney was clearly occupied by something else and dinking heavily. Any reader, whether it was 100 years ago or present day would expect Mr Maloney to be the murderer. Dahl then makes Mrs Maloney the murderer to surprise the audience. This suggests why Mary Maloney kills in the first place, to make it a better story. Mary Maloney seems the unlikely murder to surprise the audience. Mrs Maloney seems to be the more unlikely murderer to surprise the audience. Mrs Maloney seems exceptionally happy and very much enjoyed the company of her husband, she loved to luxuriate in the presence of this man She seems eager to do anything for her husband, Ill get it she cried (Mrs Maloney) jumping up. It isnt at all obvious right up to the point that she kills her husband that Mary Maloney is the murderer. Any audience, Dahl or Doyles would not put Mrs Maloney, such a loving wife, on their list of suspects. This (the element of surprise) idea, which I have expressed earlier, is what Dahl capitalises on. This is even more so for Dahls mid 20th century audience who even more surprised the woman is a murderer. In the Speckled band it isnt a shock to see that Roylott is the murderer. Dr Roylott is a violent aggressive character. In the start of the story Mrs Stoner describes how he beat his native butler to death and, on his return to England, his own two stepdaughters and everybody in the local area fear him: .. For he (Roylott) is a man of immense strength, and absolutely uncontrollable in his anger. Any reader, whether it is Doyles original 19th century audience or a modern on, would place Roylott at the top of their fist of suspects. Doyle chooses such a two dimensional-character in Roylott. Roylott is easy to dislike because of his selfish, uncaring and mean behaviour, I am a dangerous man to fall foul of he shouts at Holmes furiously. From his first appearance you can tell hes a horrible man thats easy to dislike. Holmes the meddler, Roylott screams. It would be against the conventions of Holmes for the horrible, bad, murderer to get away with it. Any reader of the Speckled Band irrespective of time would want Dr Roylott to get caught. If Mrs Maloney a nice woman were the murderer in the Speckled Band she would probably get away with it again. The fact that Roylott is horrible suggests why he is caught and Mrs Maloney isnt. We also feel pity for Mrs Maloney and if we felt pity for Roylott, Holmes wouldnt be able to catch him because it would be against conventions of the good detective catching the bad killer. This suggests why Roylott is caught. We feel pity for Mrs Maloney because she only hides her crime to protect her baby, what were the laws on unborn children? Did they kill them both mother and child. These factors build on the growing pity the audience is feeling for Mrs Maloney. Her husband who she loved so much, for her (Mrs Maloney) this was a blissful time of day enjoying his (her husbands) company after the long hours alone in the house, told her he was having a affair: This is going to be a bit of a shock to you, Im afraid he said (Mr Maloney) nd he told her She sat very still through it all, watching him with a kind of dazed horror. She kills her husband because she is mentally unstable and the growing emotion is taken out as she kills her husband. No wonder the audience feels pity for audience would, whether its Dahls 20th century one, or Doyles original 19th century one. These factors suggest Roylott was caught, because hes the bad guy and the bad guy always loses. Mrs Maloney wasnt caught because she was on the good side. This evidence shows why Mrs Maloney gets away, Roylott does not. It is also questionable whether Mrs Maloney does get away with it in these circumstances. Her husband who she greatly relied on not just for expenses, of course Ill give you money but for love, is dead. She is also left with a baby to bring up without a dad and without the money he would supply. Does Mrs Maloney get away with it? Clearly to any reader, she doesnt. So does it mean both Roylott and Mrs Maloney were caught but just in different ways. The earlier quotes link in with the motive, Roylotts is selfish; Mrs Maloneys is selfless. Mary Maloney killed her husband because he was having an affair or something along the lines. Dahl leaves the reader to play at detective; he leaves some unsolved clues, which Doyle does not allow the freedom of because Sherlock Holmes cannot miss a thing: And he told her; it didnt take long, four or five minutes at the most, and sh sat very sill through it all, with a kind of dazed horror. She is so in love with he husband she ignores him: It occurred to her he hadnt even spoken After this she realises her world is falling apart and she cracks, hence the killing. The motive, which is so cleverly hidden by Roald Dahl, is not so apparent but we have a fair idea what it is by her reaction. Any reader would be just as emotionally jacked up to killing someone; anyone would, considering her state of affairs. On the other Roylotts selfish killing for money more than underlines his greedy personality. His motive is clear and we can see why he may want to kill his stepdaughters when Mrs Stoner tells his story. We find out that in the event of marriage Roylott: would have to pay a certain annual sum in the event of our (Mrs Stoner and her sisters) marriage. Mrs Stoners twin sisters suspiciously die the night before her wedding. This shows Roylotts clear motive to kill his two stepdaughters before the night of their wedding. Mrs Stoners twin sister was killed the night before her wedding and a few weeks before this heard a strange whistle. Now Mrs Stoner before her wedding hears the same whistle: Imagine, then, my thrill of terror last night when I heard in the silence of the night the low whistle. What a coincidence! The evidence shows to any reader Roylott has a clear motive (for money) to kill his two stepdaughters and that he has already killed one. The evidence shows Roylott: is selfish; Mrs Maloneys is selfless as stated previously or Roylott is killing for money (which he does not need) and Mrs Maloney for emotional pain of having to bring up a baby on her own. Roylotts clear motive, which is apparent to a reader of either Lamb to the Slaughter or the Speckled Band, shows that he is the murderer, its just a matter of obtaining evidence. Roylotts selfish plot is uncovered because he is selfish and Sherlock Holmes as one of the conventions of his character always gets his selfish murderer. Roylott when under pressure from Holmes in the Speckled Band loses his temper and subsequently goes to Holmess house. He shouts at Holmes ever more underlining that hes the killer. If he didnt kill his stepdaughters he wouldnt worry because Holmes would not find any evidence. By going to the house and losing his temper he is almost begging to be caught: Holmes then Scotland Yard jack in the office! Roylott is so obviously the murderer any reader would be putting their life on it. The story would all most be stupid if he didnt get caught. Roylotts horrible, nasty portrayal is underlined when he storms in Holmess house: The ejaculation had been drawn from my companion (Holmes) our door had been suddenly dashed open. This underlines the audiences hate of him. His two dimensional bad man image makes the audience hate him, which makes Doyles portrayal successful. Doyle wants us to hate him so the reader reads on to see if he does get caught, which in the end is true this audience are satisfied someone they hate is caught. In Lamb to the Slaughter Mary Maloney conceals her crime in a number of ways. Firstly, lucidly enough for her she suddenly hits out at her husband with a leg of lamb and not an obvious murder weapon like a knife: Mary Maloney walked up and Swung the big frozen leg of lamb, down as hard as she could on the back of his head. This isnt an expected murder weapon and works to her side later on when the detectives eat it. After her sudden act of emotion she pulls herself together and practises speaking to the green grocer, which could act as an alibi. She tried a smile. It came out rather peculiar Hullo Sam, she (Mrs Maloney) said. She then actually goes to the green grocer and acts very calm: Patrick decided he doesnt want to eat out tonight. This shows that by managing to keep calm when under pressure, unlike Roylott, Mrs Maloney successfully hides her crime. This suggests to a modern or 19th century audience by acting natural and not losing your temper like Mrs Malone you would not get caught. After getting her alibi Mrs Maloney goes back to the lamb in the oven, which, she put in earlier acting natural. She phones the police not before seeing her husband dead on the floor, which gets her in a state, realising what she had done. This makes it easy to act natural like she says Quick! Come Patricks dead! The police arrive and go about the business of checking for clues. She then offers them a drink playing the typically portrayed housewife image. The policeman answers, I m not strictly allowed but Ill have just the one to keep me going. Mrs Maloney hears the detective that went to see the greengrocer talking about how she acted when she bought the stuff for dinner there. The detective says she was, very cheerful impossible that she (killed her husband). This shows she has got a successful alibi in he greengrocer. Mrs Maloney then goes back to manipulating the policemen by begging them to eat the lamb, please she begged eat it. Through these actions of manipulating the policemen she gets away with it. The main aspect of Mrs Maloneys story is based on the representation of woman to be feeble. Roald Dahl subverts traditional conventions by making a woman (Mrs Maloney) the murderer. A reader in the 19th century would be shocked at the idea of a woman murdering because of the sexist views on woman at this time. This is the principle reason why Mrs Maloney gets away. She plays on the convention that women are feeble breaking the convention of the male murderer. The detectives before anything subconsciously think its a man: Its the same old story. Get the murder weapon, and youve got your man. The detectives already think its a man and when she manipulates them into thinking She would never do it they have got know chance of getting her, why dont you have one yourself (Mrs Maloney as detective for a drink) you must be awfully tired. She is clearly trying to manipulate them to any reader. Unlike Roylott who is typical murderer, a man, who killed a butler, who makes Folks fly at his approach, Mrs Maloney is your much complex character who clearly to any reader or in this case the policemen not a obvious murderer. Roylott gets caught because he is your average easy to catch murderer because of what he is. If he were a nice woman who never banned anything he would not get caught. Likewise if Mrs Maloney drunk heavily wore shabby clothes she would probably get caught. It doesnt matter whos got the best plan its who is portrayed without the characteristics of your normal stereotypical murder. Mrs Maloney knows she (Mrs Maloney) knew nearly all of the men (policemen) at the precinct which adds to her favour. The policemen dont need much manipulating because they know she is a loving housewife, they (the policemen) were always nice to her. If she was horrible they wouldnt be nice but they are always nice to her, always almost suggest they make a special effort to be nice to her. Any reader irrespective of time, from the evidence shown could say all the factors of who she is as a person and what she is (a woman) successfully lead to her survival. Mrs Maloney manipulates them into eating the lamb, you must be terribly hungry and (Mrs Maloney) know Patrick would never forgive me. The police eat the lamb totally feeling sorry for Mrs Maloney. In the other room Mary Maloney to giggle shows her acknowledging the fact she manipulated them and to us she succeeded in breaking conventions. Mrs Maloney clearly manipulated so much she had the policemen breaking rules. She asks Jack Noonan a detective if he wants a whisky to which he replies Im not strictly allowed, but through Mary Maloneys manipulation he does anyway but (the detective) might just take one drop to keep me going. She then manipulates the others to having a drink, one by one the others came in and were persuaded to take a little nip of whisky. She has clearly to any audience over powering them, the whole group falling straight into her trap. The group stood round rather awkwardly trying to say consoling things, it wouldnt be awkward if they didnt care or feel sorry for her they wouldnt try to sat the right things to her but she has manipulated them so much they are going out there way to be nice. Clearly to any reader whether it a 19th century Doyle reader or a modern one you can clearly see she has manipulated them. Her behaviour before her husbands death and after is totally contrasting. From the lovely housewife she turns into a crafty killer. This shows shes more than just a housewife, like all women are but she is portrayed leading us to think differently. Unlike Mary Maloney Roylott fails to manipulate the detectives but even worse approaches them with threats. Roylotts more complex way of disguising the crime, which he thinks will hide it, is secondary to how the characters are portrayed. If you know someone did the crime its just a matter of finding evidence but if you are led to believe its definitely not them you dont even try to catch him or her, this is Roylotts fault. Roylott trys to conceal his crime by training a snake to go up a ventilator, the rope was there as a bridge for something to pass through. Roylott was put in the story to be caught by the ever-successful Holmes; if Roylott werent caught the story would be unsuccessful. The story is a jigsaw puzzle, which to us seems impossible but all the while Doyle knows Holmes will uncover it making him look intelligent and clever. Irrespective of time Holmes will always get his man. Any reader realises this as soon as Holmess name is mentioned. If Sherlock Holmes were investigating Mrs Maloney It is questionable whether she would get away with it. Note man underlines that men are the prime suspects and this is true to any audience irrespective of time. So why does Roylott get caught and Mrs Maloney doesnt? There are many aspects to say why and why not. Mrs Maloney is the protagonist in one leading her to come out on top. This is one important factor into who gets caught. They should be separated into different genres because they are so different (many differences) but it is due mainly to the authors to outcome of the story.

The Two Types of Titans in Greek Mythology

The Two Types of Titans in Greek Mythology Often counted among the gods and goddesses, there are two main groups of titans in Greek mythology. They come from different generations. The second generation is probably the one youre familiar with. They are depicted as humanoid, even if giant. The earlier ones are even bigger - as large as is visible to the naked eye - so its no wonder titanic signifies exceptional size. This page introduces both, provides mates, and spheres of influence. First Generation Titans of Greek Mythology The titans in the first generation are the aunts, uncles, and parents of Zeus and company - the well-known Olympian gods and goddesses). These titans are the 12 children of the primordial personifications of the earth (Gaia) and the sky (Uranus). (Now do you see why I said the titans were really big?) Female titans may sometimes be distinguished from their brothers as titanides. This isnt perfect, though, since there is a Greek ending on this term that should be reserved for the children of the titans rather than female version of the same. Here are the names and areas of first generation titans: Oceanus [Okeanos] - the ocean(father of nymphs)Coeus [Koios and Polos] - questioning(father of Leto Asteria)Crius [Krios, probably Megamedes the great lord [source: Theoi]](father of Pallas, Astraeus, and Perses)Hyperion - light(father of sun-god, moon, dawn)Iapetus [Iapetos](father of Prometheus, Atlas, and Epimetheus)Cronus [Kronos] (aka Saturn)Thea [Theia] - sight(Hyperions mate)Rhea [Rheia](Cronus and Rhea were the parents of the Olympian gods and goddesses)Themis - justice and order(Zeus second consort, mother of the Hours, Fates)Mnemosyne - memory(mated with Zeus to produce the Muses)Phoebe - oracle, intellect [source: Theoi(Coeus mate)Tethys(Oceans mate) The titans Cronus (#6 above) and Rhea (#8) are the parents of Zeus and the other Olympian gods and goddesses.​ Besides the Olympian gods and goddesses, the titans produced other offspring, mating with either other titans or other creatures. These offspring are also called titans, but theyre the titans of the second generation. Second Generation Titans of Greek Mythology Some of the children of the first generation titans are also referred to as titans. The major second generation titans are: AsteriaAstraea (Dike)AstraeusAtlasEos (Dawn)Eosphorus (or Hesperus)Epimetheus (see Pandoras Box)HeliusLetoMenoetiusPallasPersesPrometheusSelene As for most aspects of mythology, Carlos Parada has an excellent page on the titans. Also Known As: Ouranià ´nes, Ouranidai Examples Dione, Phorcys, Anytus, and Demeter are sometimes added to the list of 12 titans: Oceanus, Coeus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, Thea, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Phoebe, and Tethys. Youll find titans in the following stories: The castration of Ouranos,The creation of man,The fight with the gods, known as the Titanomachy, but often mixed up with the story of the gods battle with the giants, andThe imprisonment of the titans in Tartarus.

Test Your Familiarity With These Puzzling Word Pairs

Test Your Familiarity With These Puzzling Word Pairs In our Glossary of Usage, you will find more than 300 sets of confusableswords that are commonly mixed up because they look and sound alike. In the glossary, youll also find links to definitions, examples, and practice exercises that should help you keep these words straight. To test your familiarity with 50 of these often puzzling word pairs, set aside 10 or 15 minutes to take this big quiz. Select the word in each set that completes the sentence accurately and appropriately. (If youre not sure of the correct answer, follow the links for explanations and examples.) Youll find the correct answers on page two. Affect or EffectOur ultimate freedom is the right and power to decide how anybody or anything outside ourselves will _____ us. (Stephen R. Covey)Allusion or IllusionThe single biggest problem in communication is the _____ that it has taken place. (George Bernard Shaw)Aural or OralWhile visual learners prefer to learn information through charts and graphs, _____ learners prefer to hear information.Capital or CapitolBismarck is the _____ of North Dakota and the state’s second largest city.Cereal or SerialHeres what we do. We leave the car here, we take the plates off, we scratch the _____ number off the engine block, and we walk away. (Kramer in Seinfeld)Chord or CordThe governor touched a responsive _____ with voters of both parties, especially with her promise to veto any budget plan that included an increase in taxes.Click or CliqueThe vice president of China belongs to a _____ known as the princelings, descendants of prominent communist officials.Climactic or ClimaticThe new music director favors full-bodied, robust sound, which can build to daring decibel levels in _____ moments. Collaborate or CorroborateThe prosecutor closed the case, admitting that he was unable to find witnesses to _____ the allegations made against Mr. Soprano.Credible or CredulousThe most imaginative people are the most _____: for them everything is possible. (Alexander Chase)Dazed or Dazzled_____ by months of glad-handing and posturing, the candidates stumbled around the stage like finalists in a dance marathon.Defuse or DiffuseGossip is a sort of smoke that comes from the dirty tobacco-pipes of those who _____ it: it proves nothing but the bad taste of the smoker. (George Eliot)Eminent or ImminentIf so _____ an establishment as a three-star Michelin restaurant can serve toxic shellfish, what hope is there for anyone else?Fair or FareThe driver teased the poor child who had forgotten her bus _____.Faze or PhaseIm happy to say that the first _____ of our operation has met with considerable success.Finally or FinelyMy sisters bringing up had made me sensitive. In the little world in whic h children have their existence, whosoever brings them up, there is nothing so _____ perceived and so _____ felt as injustice. (Charles Dickens, Great Expectations) Flare or FlairThe bright spot in the sky was an unusually large solar _____, a stupendous explosion that belched radiation and billions of tons of matter far into space.Flaunt or FloutThe first priority of the commission should be to identify restaurant owners who knowingly _____ public-health laws.Flew, Flu, or FlueThe Wright brothers _____ right through the smoke screen of impossibility. (Charles F. Kettering)Formally or FormerlyHome computers are being called upon to perform many new functions, including the consumption of homework _____ eaten by the dog. (Doug Larson)Forth or FourthA reformer is one who sets _____ cheerfully toward sure defeat. (Lydia M. Child)Gibe, Jibe, or JiveDo you promise to jump, _____, wail, groove, rock steady, and at all times lend a helping hand to your fellow music lovers? (The Little Mermaid: Ariels Beginning)Hardy or Hearty_____ laughter is a good way to jog internally without having to go outdoors. (Norman Cousins)Homed or HonedLast year scientists re-engineered E Coli bacteria so that instead of swimming toward food they _____ in on substances released by dangerous pathogens. Hurdling or HurtlingThe ground beneath our feet is spinning at a thousand miles an hour. The entire planet is _____ around the sun at 67,000 miles an hour. And I can feel it. (The Doctor in Doctor Who)Ingenious or IngenuousSalvatore was now a great big husky fellow, tall and broad, but still with that _____ smile and those trusting, kindly eyes that he had had as a boy. (William Somerset Maugham, Salvatore)Leaches or LeechesYou are feeding off the violence and the despair of the drug trade. You are a parasite who _____ off the culture of drugs. (Maury Levy in The Wire)Lead or LedWe can chart our future clearly and wisely only when we know the path which has _____ to the present. (Adlai E. Stevenson)Liable or LibelIf you shoot me, youre _____ to lose a lot of those humanitarian awards. (Chevy Chase in Fletch)Loose or LoseThe best way to find yourself is to _____ yourself in the service of others. (Mohandas Gandhi)Miner or MinorParents are conditioned to put up with a few _____ acciden ts when they leave their children home alonea broken vase, spilled milk on the rug. Official or OfficiousJulia Child once grabbed a pepper mill from the hands of an _____ waiter before he had a chance to spoil her carefully ordered dish.Palate, Palette, or PalletYes, gentlemen, I have here just about the handiest, dandiest little bookful of gastronomical surprises that ever tempted the jaded _____ of a fastidious f-f-food fancier. (Daffy Duck)Peak, Peek, or PiqueThe man who unified China in the third century B.C. conquered six other feudal states to do it, built the first version of the Great Wall and in a fit of _____ may have buried hundreds of scholars alive. (Time magazine, May 18, 2008)Plain or PlaneI remain just one thing, and one thing only, and that is a clown. It places me on a far higher _____ than any politician. (Charlie Chaplin)Pole or PollA public-opinion _____ is no substitute for thought.(Warren Buffett)Prescribed or ProscribedThe Canadian government added the Somali al-Shabaab group to its list of _____ terror groups.Principal or PrincipleAll animal s, except man, know that the _____ business of life is to enjoy it. (Samuel Butler) Prostate or ProstrateMiss Everglot, what are you doing here? You should be at home, _____ with grief. (Pastor Galswells in Corpse Bride)Regretful or RegrettableThe movie is beautiful, luscious, and elegiac, but it has the _____ drawback of being dreadfully boring.Reluctant or ReticentThe teacher tried to make conversation, but the boy remained _____ and refused to make eye contact.Restive or RestlessMy _____, roaming spirit would not allow me to remain at home very long. (Buffalo Bill Cody)Riffled or RifledWith quiet precision, the thief _____ the pouch, placed most of its contents in a briefcase and walked confidently out of the embassy.Role or RollChange does not _____ in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle. (Martin Luther King, Jr.)Stanch or StaunchTheres an evil on these seas that even the most _____ and bloodthirsty pirates have come to fear. (Tia Dalma in Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End)Suit or SuiteId walk through hell in a gasoline __ ___ to play baseball. (Pete Rose) Tack or TactThe Viper, to me, is the quintessential American muscle carbrute power, great looks and about as much _____ as a grunge band crashing a cotillion. (Bill Griffith, The Boston Globe)Troop or TroupeIn the end, the plucky singing Scot lost out to a dance _____.Vale or VeilOur own self-love draws a thick _____ between us and our faults. (Lord Chesterfield)Whos or WhoseNever go to a doctor _____ office plants have died. (Erma Bombeck) Here Are the Answers illusionauralcapitalserialchordcliqueclimacticcorroboratecredulousDazeddiffuseeminentfarephasefinely, finelyflarefloutflewformerlyforthjiveHeartyhomedhurtlingingenuousleechesledliableloseminorofficiouspalatepiqueplanepollproscribedprincipalprostrateregrettablereticentrestlessrifledrollstaunchsuittacttroupeveilwhose More Big Quizzes The Third Big Quiz on Commonly Confused Words

The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire - Research Paper Example 146 garment workers lost their lives and 71 people injured due to this disaster in which 23 were men employees and the rest 123 were the female employees. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory was located in Asch Building. This factory occupied the entire eighth, ninth and tenth floor of the Asch building. The fire took place due to burn of the garbage and wastages. Poor administration and management caused the death of several priceless lives. The employees in the ninth floor did not get any kind of notification or fire alarm right after the breakout of fire. However, the legacy of this disaster still continues as the citizens of United States of America still share their sadness in the memory of the victims. This particular disaster forced the government regulatory bodies to develop several legislations and policies for the organizations in order to ensure workplace health and safety of the employees. This essay will determine the impact of The Triangle Shirtwaist factory Fire on the emp loyers, employees, community, and industry and labor movement. Effect on Labor Movement It is true that this accident is considered as the deadliest industrial disaster in the history of the United States of America. Several immigrants from Italy including both men and women were the major victims of this disaster. This accident had a strong legacy. One week after the disaster, the workers in the state planned to host a meeting regarding the inadequate workplace environment and lack of safety aspect in the factories and workplace. The citizens of United States of America and immigrants from different countries participated in the meeting to reform a labor movement in order to raise the voice against inadequate workplace health and safety aspect. People of all religious and cultural background started to host a merge or procession in the memory of victims to raise the voice against the business owners who do not think about the good health and safety of the workers. Few days, after t he meeting, near about 3, 50, 000 people participated in the funeral march for the victims who lost their lives due to the particular industrial disaster (English 1). It is true that employees or the labors are the major business growth drivers of an organization. It is the responsibility of the business owners tom ensure healthy and safe workplace environment. However, immigrants from other countries started to leave their jobs due to immense fear from the particular incident. In addition to this, the social environment in United States of America was not favorable for the immigrants and the citizens of lower income group. The economic environment of United States of America was not that much prosperous and developed. People of lower or lower-middle class income group had to face difficulty to lead a healthy and standard life style. These issues were developing for several years in the United States of America. But, the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire ignited the flame among the p eople. They tried to oppose the inadequate industrial standards and organizational policies through protest merge. However, it was highly important and essential for these immigrants and deprived citizens to get united and oppose the developed policies. A strong labor movement took place across the States in protest of the brutal disaster which forced the government regulatory bodies, industrial regulatory bodies

Employment At Will Doctrine Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Employment At Will Doctrine - Assignment Example Therefore, even when there is no written contract between the employer and the employee, as long as there was an oral contract, termination of employment should only be for cause and the correct procedures have to be followed (Arnow-Richman,  Glynn, & Sullivan, 2007). The covenant of good faith exception states that the dismissal of an employee is illegal if it is done with malicious intentions or in bad faith, e.g., firing an employee just before a large commission on the job completed is payable. Apart from common law exceptions, there are also other statutory exceptions that are not as popular as their counterparts and have not been widely adopted in many states, for most are similar to the common law exceptions (Stone,  2007). In regard to the first case where one of the employees posted a rant on Facebook criticizing the company’s most important customer, it is very clear that he has gone against the good will of the company and his actions can cause a great loss to t he company. Posting a rant on social media amounts to engagement in matters of public interest and going against professional code of ethics. Therefore in regard to the doctrine, publicly criticizing the company’s most important customer is against the company’s ethics, hence the best decision will be to fire him and that will not cause the company any legal damages (Johnson & Wall Jr., 2006). In the second case, Jim sent an email to other salespeople protesting a change in commission schedules and bonuses and suggesting everyone boycott at the next sales meeting. Jim has the freedom to exercise his right of expression. This is the contravention of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The... With this security established, the employees will prefer to report any illegal undertakings internally rather than externally, hence giving the company a chance to deal with the affairs appropriately, reducing the risk of bad publicity. A good whistleblower policy should clearly define what type of acts need to be reported. This is to prevent reporting of petty issues that can be dealt with at lower management levels. Also, the issues to be reported should be those that involve breaking of companies’ regulations or public policy. It should also clearly define the channels to be followed when reporting any wrongdoing. This will avoid information getting into the wrong hands who may use it for blackmail instead of taking the necessary action. The policy should also have general regulations that protect the whistleblowers. Therefore, for any company aiming to reduce scuffles between the management and employees, it should adopt a good whistle blower policy, follow the employment -at-will doctrine together with the exceptions, and try as much as possible to use utilitarianism in decision making. In as much as both the common law and the exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine exist, the presumptions still remain a very important feature in many organizations. An employee may have a lot of claims, but it may be hard to prove them. Apart from that, the claims may be not recognized in some jurisdictions since the interpretation of the protections and exceptions in the common law may be misconstrued.